> Nice example of democracy and mutual respect in action. Is that supposed to be a back-handed way of making a point? I don't understand what those things have

> Nice example of democracy and mutual respect in action. Is that supposed to be a back-handed way of making a point? I don't understand what those things have to do with global stability. Someone will be the de facto world police by force, now that the technology to utilize energy is so efficient. This situation has nothing to do with some sort of (USA-centered) Politically Correct philosophy. This situation is the eventuality of our time.