It can be interpreted that because proving intend to stir racial hatred is so hard to prove, that it is offers a good protection for any form of online speech.

It can be interpreted that because proving intend to stir racial hatred is so hard to prove, that it is offers a good protection for any form of online speech. But yes, I would go with your version and think the arguments for better protections are dishonest. Honestly every form of executive overreach on internet comments has been a disaster. In Germany we also had some cases like this and you don't get info People responsible for it are nauseous and unfit to deal with real problems and worst of all have inspired dictators around the world. Problem is there is little room for criticism, because people responsible have real racists throwing insults at them left and right and your attempt to voice opposition will sort you right into these groups.