> I encourage the interested to read https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/scientific-reproducibilit https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/scientific-reproducibilit..

> I encourage the interested to read https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/scientific-reproducibilit https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/scientific-reproducibilit... This link clearly talks about reproducible results, not reproducible data. Wherever there is some degree of randomness, we would not expect to get the same data, but we would expect to draw the same conclusion. See also: the Mendelian paradox - it is sometimes argued that Gregor Mendel's results were too perfect, and yet he is honoured as the father of genetics.