3 ms·
They don't need to act like a charity and nobody expects them to. They should decide if the features are a purchase or not, if they are why are they taking them
by kadoban 6y ago
They don't need to act like a charity and nobody expects them to. They should decide if the features are a purchase or not, if they are why are they taking them back? If they're not, why are they selling them like purchases?
- toomuchtodo 6y agoI don’t see anything in my purchase agreement that indicates you own it or can resell your Autopilot license. Agree the messaging could be improved.
- kadoban 6y agoThen they're selling features for tens of thousands of dollars and what are you buying? Do even they know? Sounds like they're deciding retroactively case-by-case what the original purchase meant.
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]
- FpUser 6y agoUnless they explicitly tell that you do not own the opposite should be the default
- myko 6y agoWhen I bought Autopilot I asked about taking it to another Tesla if I bought one, and was told it belonged to the car. Meaning when I sell the vehicle I assumed I could advertise that I was selling Autopilot with it. Tesla is 100% in the wrong here.
- davidgould 6y agoThey would be in the wrong if that is what they were doing, but it isn’t. If you sell your car to a private party it keeps all its options. If you sell it back to Tesla, ie trade in, they may add or subtract options before reselling it. That said, there have been some screwups, especially with third party dealers, leading to the current kerfluffle.