3 ms·

No, because you keep comparing nonquestionable to nonquestionable or questionable to questionable. Your point really isn't coming across well here.

mullingitover 6y ago
Non-questionable? I would put 'individual is a regular poster on 8chan, a site which regularly has child pornography posted' and 'individual is a regular attendee of underground dogfights' in basically the same category. That's just me, I guess.
- yeetawayhn 6y ago
  Yes, non-questionable. You tried to compare massage parlors with strip clubs when neither are questionable. On the other hand, both underground dogfights and boxing matches are both questionable. Your position is all over the place. It's sad, really.
r00fus 6y ago
It's coming across fine to me - the "alt" versions are questionable.
- yeetawayhn 6y ago
  What makes boxing matches questionable compared to underground dogfights?
  - pwinnski 6y ago
    You seem to be missing the entire point. Questionable alternatives to twitter are "alternatives" only in the sense that questionable alternative to mainstream entertainment options are "alternatives." The entire point is that boxing matches are not questionable, while underground dogfights are illegal and not really therefore a reasonable alternative.
    - yeetawayhn 6y ago
      Yet boxing matches are questionable. Underground dogfights being illegal is a tangential point, based only in legal semantics.
  - mullingitover 6y ago
    Nothing, boxing matches are an above-board activity, as opposed to dogfighting, that's my point. Above-board web sites with reasonable moderation standards are doing fine, and always have been.
    - yeetawayhn 6y ago
      That's just circular reasoning. You claim they're "above board" because they are not questionable, but the only metric by which you deem them not questionable is that they are "above board". This discussion is going nowhere as long as you don't understand that.

mullingitover 6y ago

Non-questionable? I would put 'individual is a regular poster on 8chan, a site which regularly has child pornography posted' and 'individual is a regular attendee of underground dogfights' in basically the same category. That's just me, I guess.

yeetawayhn 6y ago
Yes, non-questionable. You tried to compare massage parlors with strip clubs when neither are questionable. On the other hand, both underground dogfights and boxing matches are both questionable. Your position is all over the place. It's sad, really.

r00fus 6y ago

It's coming across fine to me - the "alt" versions are questionable.

yeetawayhn 6y ago
What makes boxing matches questionable compared to underground dogfights?
- pwinnski 6y ago
  You seem to be missing the entire point. Questionable alternatives to twitter are "alternatives" only in the sense that questionable alternative to mainstream entertainment options are "alternatives." The entire point is that boxing matches are not questionable, while underground dogfights are illegal and not really therefore a reasonable alternative.
  - yeetawayhn 6y ago
    Yet boxing matches are questionable. Underground dogfights being illegal is a tangential point, based only in legal semantics.
- mullingitover 6y ago
  Nothing, boxing matches are an above-board activity, as opposed to dogfighting, that's my point. Above-board web sites with reasonable moderation standards are doing fine, and always have been.
  - yeetawayhn 6y ago
    That's just circular reasoning. You claim they're "above board" because they are not questionable, but the only metric by which you deem them not questionable is that they are "above board". This discussion is going nowhere as long as you don't understand that.