5 ms·
This is great! I was ready to update to an RTX 30-series card once they were finally available, but now I'm strongly considering a RX 6000-series card. Of cour
by CivBase 6y ago
This is great! I was ready to update to an RTX 30-series card once they were finally available, but now I'm strongly considering a RX 6000-series card.
Of course, even if AMD's benchmarks are representative of how the card will actually perform and even with the lower price, I still have to consider Nvidia for their software features. Shadow Play, G-Sync, and RTX Voice are some nice features. Not to mention DLSS...
With the $1000 price tag on the RX 6900 XT, though, I think Nvidia would be crazy to not lower the price of the RTX 3090.
- djsumdog 6y agoWe'll have to wait for the benchmarks and YouTube videos. What if the new AMD cards look amazing without DLSS and have comparable framerates? I current have a small-form-factor case with a 2080-Ti in it. As it stand, the biggest nVidia card I can put in would be the 3080. I'm curious if the 6900 XT is a two slot design, or if it's massive like the 8090 with the three slot requirement.
- moonbas3 6y agoIt's 2.5 slots and shorter than the 3090. https://twitter.com/Radeon/status/1321590889396002816/photo/1 https://twitter.com/Radeon/status/1321590889396002816/photo/...
- snvzz 6y ago>Shadow Play, G-Sync, and RTX Voice are some nice features. Not to mention DLSS... AIUI AMD has their own alternatives to all of these (minus RTX Voice, which I hadn't even heard about until your mention). I do not know how good they are, but I expect there to not be much difference. As DLSS 2.0, they're supposedly releasing a competitor in next month's drivers.
- CivBase 6y agoI had not heard of ReLive until now, but it's nice to know that AMD has an alternative to ShadowPlay. FreeSync is an adaptive-sync solution, but it isn't a complete alternative to G-Sync. G-Sync displays require special hardware from Nvidia, must adhere to a series of certifications from Nvidia, and don't always support adaptive-sync at low framerates. RTX Voice is probably not super important for a lot of people. However, as someone who prefers to not wear headphones for long periods of time, it sounds like an extremely useful technology. And DLSS 2.0 is a pretty big deal for anyone with a 4K screen. I don't have a 4K monitor, but I regularly connect my computer to my 4K TV so I would probably leverage DLSS often. I hope AMD's upcoming solution is comparable, but I need to see it before I give them credit for it.
- snvzz 6y ago>However, as someone who prefers to not wear headphones for long periods of time, it sounds like an extremely useful technology. Very random but: Have you considered full-sized open-back headphones? They're at least an order of magnitude better experience, in sound and comfort. I use/favor/recommend Sennheiser's HD600.
- CivBase 6y agoI got some Sennheiser HD 380 Pros for the office a few years ago. They're comfortable and sound good for the price, but they get a bit too warm for me after a couple hours. I was avoiding open-backed headphones at the time because I've heard they leak audio and didn't want to annoy my coworkers. Now I work remote, so maybe I should re-consider open-backed headphones if they breath better. Thanks for the suggestion!
- snvzz 6y ago>but they get a bit too warm for me after a couple hours. I use HD380 Pro at the office, too. They're comfortable for closed, but they still do get ears/head warm over time. This is in contrast to HD600. The sound is also like night and day difference. >I've heard they leak audio and didn't want to annoy my coworkers. At healthy (as in low and plenty sufficient) volumes this is not an issue. The reason I use closed headphones in the office is the other way around: I can hear my coworkers and they're louder than my music is. >so maybe I should re-consider open-backed headphones if they breath better. Thanks for the suggestion! You're welcome. I'm confident you can't go wrong with HD600, they're legendary all-rounder, neutral-tuned, uncolored headphones, and at their price they're a steal, but do watch/read some reviews before making the call, for your own sanity. Do note that HD650/660S are less neutral and near-universally considered worse by reviewers, on both subjective and objective (measurements) metrics, even when more expensive. And the lower end HD599/etc models aren't even comparable on a level field, in neither sound nor build. (HD600 are modular and built like tanks. The parts are compatible with 580/650/660S and sold individually, for the worst case and unlikely scenario of breaking anything) They're 300 to 600Ω impedance across the frequency range, so they do benefit greatly from a headphone amp, but will still sound great even from an anemic source. If you end up feeling like buying a dac/amp combo to get that extra, perceivable improvement, do look into "Audio Science Review (ASR)" community for no-bullshit hard measurement driven reviews. There's excellent solutions that do not break the bank, and a lot of hocus-pocus that measures like shit and yet has outrageous asking prices.