4 ms·
It was an art of oration. Not a science driven exploitation of basic human instincts. They didn't have a focus groups A-B testing and neurological studies bac
by me_me_me 6y ago
It was an art of oration.
Not a science driven exploitation of basic human instincts.
They didn't have a focus groups A-B testing and neurological studies back then.
That's a bit like saying that the impact on climate change back 1000 years ago and now is the same, as in both cases we are releasing carbon into atmosphere.
- marcosdumay 6y agoIt was the closest they had to a science, and it was aimed at manipulating the listener in a predetermined way. The fact that it was mostly applied at civil politics tells more about their society than about the tool...