6 ms·
I won't be buying any Adobe products any more. From their extremely high prices, to forced subscriptions/cloud only products to their terrible security track re
by Vanderson 6y ago
I won't be buying any Adobe products any more. From their extremely high prices, to forced subscriptions/cloud only products to their terrible security track record.
Thankfully there are now many cheaper and better alternatives to buy from.
- Uehreka 6y agoWhenever people say this I ask about After Effects. I have yet to find a FOSS or cheaper substitute. Many people have suggestions for Premiere Pro replacements, but not After Effects.
- gilrain 6y agoHave you tried DaVinci Resolve? It's not FOSS, but it is a pro-level After Effects replacement with much more reasonable terms.
- Jasper_ 6y agoDaVinci Resolve feels more like a Nuke clone; it's production film compositing, not the compositing-and-animation mix that After Effects is.
- jpm48 6y agoYou can do most things AE will do with a combination of Natron and Blender.
- deltron3030 6y agoYou can't replace the huge template and plugin ecosystem of AE. That's what really drives the adoption.
- marksalpeter 6y agoFor simple 2d ui animations I use Flow instead of AE + bodymovin. I highly recommend it for simple stuff. https://createwithflow.com/ https://createwithflow.com/
- open-source-ux 6y agoIf you want to do 2D motion graphics, there is no real rival for After Effects (AE). A new motion and animation app called Cavalry recently launched but it's far too early to see if it can rival AE. It also uses an online subscription model (https://cavalry.scenegroup.co/ https://cavalry.scenegroup.co/).
- interpol_p 6y agoI really like Apple Motion, but that's also a commercial substitute. The $50 once-off price is very good, though
- kkapelon 6y agoBlackmagic Design Fusion (now part of Davinci resolve). For really simple things you can also use Hitfilm Pro There is also https://natrongithub.github.io/ https://natrongithub.github.io/ but I haven't personally tried it
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]
- strogonoff 6y agoHands down, Blender. See Ian Hubert’s channel[0] for samples of what can be achieved with Blender by a tiny team. His examples tend to be specific to VFX, but Blender is quite general-purpose as far as motion design goes with an NLE, support for the familiar “expressions” paradigm, and so on. [0] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RxD6H3ri8RI https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RxD6H3ri8RI
- jp555 6y agoBlender seconded. I mean, can you code procedural FX with Python in After Effects? You can in Blender. And it's free. 2.90 is shockingly good.
- FrozenSynapse 6y agoBlender's video tools have been overlooked recently. Video work is limited.
- Uehreka 6y agoI use Blender and Ian Hubert’s recent work is what got me into it. It’s an excellent tool when it comes to the kind of motion-tracked work he does (and which I hope to get into) but for quickly cutting together motion graphics I have not found it to be as handy.
- Ninjinka 6y agoI won't be "buying" any of their products anymore either...
- mushbino 6y agoI used Adobe products, almost all of them, for over 20 years and I felt so burned by their business model that I don't even want it for free at this point. Also, Fireworks was the best mockup tool they had and instead of improving/evolving it they killed it.
- Vanderson 6y agoI was a beta tester for Fireworks for one version. It was a pure joy to work with. It was the best web design/interface design software for years. And yes, another reason I have lost faith in Adobe as a company is them bailing on Fireworks. Maybe because it was a Macromedia product originally. It seems every Macromedia product has been abandoned/neglected by Adobe.
- alexashka 6y agoVery cool. Adobe stock has nearly doubled in the past 12 months and they've been on an upward trajectory for the past 5 years. Once Adobe realized they're competing with piracy the same way the music industry was, oops, all of a sudden there are profits to be made from simply charging a fair price. Who woulda thunk it.
- addicted 6y agoOr rather, they are making money by never letting people own the stuff they buy and only renting it out. They get more money out of us, for a lesser product, that we have even less control of.
- FrozenSynapse 6y ago$50-ish is a very small monthly price if you're making money using those apps.
- pjmlp 6y agoSo given the subject at hand where is the cheaper and better alternatives to XD, with the same feature set?
- nl 6y agoI think Figma and Sketch are often classed as competitors, and I know many prefer one of those. I'm unsure how pricing compares.
- pjmlp 6y agoSketch is not multi-platform, so no real alternative. Figma doesn't support the design capabilities for native app design, so no real alternative. Where is then the alternative?
- nl 6y agoI have no idea what your priorities are, so it's hard to guess. XD doesn't support Linux either. Apparently https://icons8.com/lunacy https://icons8.com/lunacy runs on Windows and can import and export to Sketch. Figma of course runs in a browser so works fine on all, and there is a Mobile UI toolkit for it: https://www.figma.com/templates/mobile-ui-kit/ https://www.figma.com/templates/mobile-ui-kit/ https://www.smashingmagazine.com/2019/04/sketch-figma-adobe-xd-ui-design-applications/ https://www.smashingmagazine.com/2019/04/sketch-figma-adobe-... https://www.codeinwp.com/blog/figma-vs-sketch-vs-adobe-xd/ https://www.codeinwp.com/blog/figma-vs-sketch-vs-adobe-xd/ But maybe what you need is... Adobe XD? I personally quite like it.
- Nathanael_M 6y agoI'm pretty much completely invested in the Adobe ecosystem. I don't find it expensive at all for how much I get out of it, but if there's a better option than Illustrator/Photoshop/InDesign I'd love to hear about it.