3 ms·
You could've read the very next sentence, which makes the point the first sentence set up: > Assets must be accounted for when calculating wealth, so the tax s
by matthew-hale 6y ago
You could've read the very next sentence, which makes the point the first sentence set up:
> Assets must be accounted for when calculating wealth, so the tax service will be required to track and value assets including vehicles, homes, and material good etc. for every citizen to see if the wealth tax would apply to them -- if we didn't report material goods, the wealthy could sock money away in expensive cars, artworks, jewelry and other material non-real-estate assets as they already do for investment.
- adverbly 6y agoWhat you are describing is tax fraud and is already possible in the current system.