33 ms·
I don't want to be that guy but I originally thought the CSS was broken. Harsh black on harsh white, everything squeezed in to the left third of my screen, and
by neurotrace 6y ago
I don't want to be that guy but I originally thought the CSS was broken. Harsh black on harsh white, everything squeezed in to the left third of my screen, and an unused scrollbar on the bottom.
That being said, I love the information. I don't care for the workflow that comes with the most popular parser generators and I inevitably want more control over my parser as I start adding error handling, etc. It's easier to just write it by hand in the first place
- millstone 6y agoI think the design is great. Simple and easy to read.
- neurotrace 6y agoDifferent strokes for different folks, I suppose. I found it to be confusing and painful
- Supermancho 6y agoI'm not quite sure why they went with the borked "half the screen is empty" look. Ok, it's easier to read, but that negative space is bad design, regardless.
- toolz 6y agoI found the design to be very intuitive even though I'd never encountered that type of information flow before. The curly braces didn't seem to serve any purpose as far as I could tell, but the negative space was great. I knew exactly where the content was going to pop up before I clicked the "link". No jarring resize, just plain ole empty space not taking your attention away from the main content until you want see content in there.
- megous 6y agoBecause... ? https://megous.com/dl/tmp/da01875b777013e9.png https://megous.com/dl/tmp/da01875b777013e9.png
- contravariant 6y agoThere are unused scrollbars everywhere. It's quite an interesting example of scrollbar blindness [1]. [1]:https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24293421 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24293421