6 ms·
Would you pay a small fee, say 20 Euro, a year for a Firefox version which guarantees no-ads or pocket? If enough people feel like that they might consider it.
by jsiepkes 6y ago
Would you pay a small fee, say 20 Euro, a year for a Firefox version which guarantees no-ads or pocket? If enough people feel like that they might consider it.
Meanwhile something has got to pay for the bills. I don't think advertising for their own VPN service is too bad.
- LarvaFX 6y agoI would have but since they fired the devtools and mdn team, it's only a matter of time until firefox becomes totally irrelevant.
- pbhjpbhj 6y agoCan't have a dev team using up wages when that money could go on bonuses to an already hugely overpaid executive now can we!
- leeoniya 6y ago> Would you pay a small fee, say 20 Euro, a year for a Firefox version which guarantees no-ads or pocket? i would have, even $50. but not after they've laid off most of their servo engineers to focus the company on more idiotic moneygrabs. there was never a way to pay for firefox. only some black hole foundation contrib that probably went to their many failed, poorly-conceived initiatives.
- parliament32 6y agoI'd honestly happily pay for an FF license (or support license or something) if it was guaranteed the money was going directly to FF development instead of other Mozilla initiatives.
- detritus 6y agoI'd happily pay at least £5 a month for Firefox, if I could. If I were richer, I'd pay more, and I totally understand the millions of people who don't want to pay a penny. From having read lots of posts over the years - here and elsewhere - I get the sense it would at least be worth their while opening up some kind of donate/subscription function, for people who feel they want to help.