I think that Raspberry Pi Foundation is correct here. I think that this is just a notice to not use Raspberry Pi in the site and transfer the domain to Raspberr

I think that Raspberry Pi Foundation is correct here. I think that this is just a notice to not use Raspberry Pi in the site and transfer the domain to Raspberry Pi foundation (this is questionable). Reason why i am saying this is that i saw this article with the title "Introducing the Raspberry Pi 3 B+ Single Board Computer" https://www.raspberrypi-spy.co.uk/2018/03/introducing-raspberry-pi-3-b-plus-computer/ https://www.raspberrypi-spy.co.uk/2018/03/introducing-raspbe... They could have written "Review of" instead of "Introducing" . At the end, I think that Raspberry Pi must also clarify properly the terms of usage of their assets in their website. For media usage,it is better to permit users to use some assets.