3 ms·
They're not good-faith scientists. Bhattacharya is a co-author of the widely debunked Stanford seroprevalence study. Kulldorff doesn't believe in child-to-adult
by wonnage 6y ago
They're not good-faith scientists. Bhattacharya is a co-author of the widely debunked Stanford seroprevalence study. Kulldorff doesn't believe in child-to-adult transmission. I think this is an appropriate response.
- dekhn 6y agoI do agree their scientific positions are tenuous, but having worked in a few scientific fields where the mainstream ultimately was proved completely and totally wrong (RNA can be an enzyme, the ribosome is an RNA machine) I've learned that even scientists who appear to be "not good faith" may be as ethical and as intelligent as the people they were disagreeing with. I wouldn't classify Bhattacharya in the same bin as Peter Deusberg (well known virologist who insisteted that HIV transmission did not cause AIDS).