3 ms·

> Are you talking about the footer? Why don't you look at the header? > To most people who aren't familiar with the DuckDuckGo logo, this would indeed look li

• oefrha 6y ago
  > Why don't you look at the header? And why don't you look at my comment talking about the header? > Seriously??? You seriously think more than 10% of Internet users recognize the DuckDuckGo logo? (Actually, s/10%/1%/.)
  • soraminazuki 6y ago
    > And why don't you look at my comment talking about the header? 1. You only mentioned about it in an edit, it's disingenuous to suggest that I intentionally ignored it. 2. It says "DuckDuckGo News" even before you scroll down the page. > You seriously think more than 10% of Internet users recognize the DuckDuckGo logo? I find the accusation that DDG is engaging in "astroturfing" when they clearly identify themselves ridiculous.
    • oefrha 6y ago
      > 1. You only mentioned about it in an edit, it's disingenuous to suggest that I intentionally ignored it. My comment was talking about the actual header in the first place. And I posted the edit about the sticky header like ten minutes before your reply. But maybe you didn't refresh the page, so whatever. If I was disingenuous I wouldn't have labelled it clearly as an edit, unlike the site which isn't clearly labeled as a corporate blog, until you scroll down. > 2. It says "DuckDuckGo News" even before you scroll down the page. "DuckDuckGo News" is only a category among many. A privacy advocacy group blog can't have a category called "DuckDuckGo News"? Hell, many people's personal blogs have Google, Microsoft, Apple, etc. categories.