4 ms·
I'm not 100% sure where I stand on the issue but that analogy falls a little flat - the potential reach of a couple of posters on a couple of streets is much sm
by silvester23 6y ago
I'm not 100% sure where I stand on the issue but that analogy falls a little flat - the potential reach of a couple of posters on a couple of streets is much smaller than that of posts online.
- chii 6y agoso you're saying that as long as you can limit the reach of a message, anonymity is fine? Where and who decides that line? I think society should either accept that if there should be anonymity, that there must also be free speech (which includes free speech you may not like). And the inverse is also true - that if there's no anonymity, then there can be no free speech (including free speech you _do_ like).
- jamespo 6y agoThis might shock you but the world is full of shades of grey