4 ms·
I have the 4GB version of the Nano and the 4GB Raspberry Pi. I like the Nano, but I use it mostly as a development machine and for that I would rank the 8GB Ras
by talkingtab 6y ago
I have the 4GB version of the Nano and the 4GB Raspberry Pi. I like the Nano, but I use it mostly as a development machine and for that I would rank the 8GB Raspberry Pi at about $89 US the best deal. Substantially below that is the Nano, and almost tied is 4GB Pi. There may be cases where you absolutely need an Nvidia machine in which case I would argue for the 4GB version, but otherwise the 8GB Pi appears to be the winner by a long shot.
- Florin_Andrei 6y agoI think the whole idea for the Nano was having a GPU on a small computer. The RPi doesn't have that. If you're comparing them as plain CPU-based development systems, you're missing the whole point of the Nano.
- talkingtab 6y agoJust so there is no confusion, the Raspberry Pi 4 supports dual 4k displays out of the box. It has a built in Broadcom VideoCore VI @ 500 Mhz GPU and dual micro HDMI ports so you are good to go. Perhaps you meant a discrete GPU?
- erichocean 6y agoThe Nano supports CUDA; the Pi doesn't.
- Florin_Andrei 6y agoThis is not about the display. It's about running CUDA-accelerated machine learning stuff. Think - pytorch. That's the whole point of the Nano. If you're not doing that, use an RPi.
- DoctorOetker 6y agodo you happen to know the memory bandwidth if these newer Raspberry Pi's? I can't find it on the product site, nor the BCM2711 datasheet (more like a programmers manual)
- soylentgraham 6y agoNvidia's video decoder/encoder is noticeably faster too