3 ms·
I have to admit, while I cannot stand Apple and I am constantly opposed to them and I consider them personally a net negative in today's world, in this particul
by newbie578 6y ago
I have to admit, while I cannot stand Apple and I am constantly opposed to them and I consider them personally a net negative in today's world, in this particular situation it seems they are not the "rotten" party, or would it be better to say that they are the "lesser evil".
Reading through the document I am honestly shocked at the behaviour of the CEO, I mean come on how entitled do you have to be to try and think you have a right to sell employees of your choosing to Apple for a handsome fee, like they are your cattle..
- raziel2701 6y agoYeah it expands the whole concept of wage slavery.
- lopmotr 6y agoNo it doesn't at all. Those employees were always free to apply to Apple independently. This finder's fee sounds like the commission a recruitment agency would charge for literally finding workers. That's a perfectly reasonable way to charge for that service.
- djur 6y agoOK, let's set aside the fact that the CEO was the engineers' current supervisor and regard her just as a recruiter. If a recruiter contacted an engineer and says "Apple is looking for engineers with your skills", and then contacted Apple and said "I know a great engineer who's interested in working with you, here's their resume", and Apple proceeded to hire the engineer without paying a finder's fee, would the recruiter have cause for a lawsuit against either party?