>governments don't ban user tracking You mean like governments whose "authorities" salivate when someone has a "smart device" (aka something in your house with

>governments don't ban user tracking You mean like governments whose "authorities" salivate when someone has a "smart device" (aka something in your house with a camera and/or speaker) that records every word you say 24/7? The same government/authorities that solve crimes based on your fitbit tracker tracking your heartrate? (It was in the news a couple of years ago - also discussed in HN) Most "eyes" governments do their best to increase tracking, reduce encryption, reduce the cost of policing (and information collection and processing).