4 ms·
This reminds me of the mcdonalds vs scalding tea lady lawsuit (IIRC, the claim was the cup did not indicate the contents were hot, so now all such cups do). Th
by lhorie 6y ago
This reminds me of the mcdonalds vs scalding tea lady lawsuit (IIRC, the claim was the cup did not indicate the contents were hot, so now all such cups do).
The difference here though is that London is setting itself up to a situation where it can't deregulate without losing face, can't play favorites anymore (because regulations are "supposed to be fair") but the regulations are so demanding that it makes it significantly more difficult for competition to enter the market, ultimately strengthening Uber's position.
- mintplant 6y ago> IIRC, the claim was the cup did not indicate the contents were hot, so now all such cups do The claim was that the coffee itself was too hot, hotter than served at other establishments. Hot enough to give her huge third-degree burns across both her legs which required skin grafts and two years of further medical treatment. I've seen the photos—they're horrific.
- pwdisswordfish0 6y ago> This reminds me of the mcdonalds vs scalding tea lady lawsuit (IIRC, the claim was the cup did not indicate the contents were hot, so now all such cups do) Nope.