4 ms·
I don't know, but it sounds like the issue was resolved (correctly or incorrectly) the first time, so the user started filing a ton of issues, which were automa
by ipsum2 6y ago
I don't know, but it sounds like the issue was resolved (correctly or incorrectly) the first time, so the user started filing a ton of issues, which were automatically marked as duplicate. Now he's spamming the white hat security form (https://twitter.com/dannyjhall/status/1310231761444581385 https://twitter.com/dannyjhall/status/1310231761444581385), which is not likely to get him a response.
- 6gvONxR4sf7o 6y ago“Spamming?” If repeated complaints about an issue the company won’t resolve is what we call spam now, I’m speechless.
- verroq 6y agoHe is a “free” user, what duty does Facebook owe him?
- 6gvONxR4sf7o 6y agoAre we talking legal duty or “not being an asshole” duty? I’d argue it’s at least the latter, where the case should be pretty clear.
- mumblerino 6y agoAh yes sure you don’t pay Google a dime, so don’t you worry if you lose your account tomorrow, it’s not like anything is owed to you. Say bye to verroq@gmail.com
- verroq 6y agoNot sure what your point is because that’s happened to people and they have no recourse.
- colejohnson66 6y agoThat being the status quo doesn’t make it acceptable?
- ipsum2 6y agoSpamming the white hat security bug program won't get him an answer, because he's not reporting a security flaw.
- hdjdbtbgwjsn 6y agohttps://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spamming https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spamming I don't understand how he is 'spamming'.