4 ms·
I don't think it's reasonable to make a comment like this without explaining why. He has designed a programming language, so it seems fair to assume he'd have
by TheRealSteel 6y ago
I don't think it's reasonable to make a comment like this without explaining why.
He has designed a programming language, so it seems fair to assume he'd have an understanding of programming language design.
- the_hoser 6y agoYou got a link for the compiler for said programming language?
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]
- ratww 6y agoI'm also not a fan of closed-source compilers (or fully closed, even worse), but it's unfair to disregard his work and opinions just because it's not publicly available. Regardless of that, this is not a discussion about compilers or compiler design/programming, but rather about PL design, which are two different areas and disciplines.
- the_hoser 6y agoI'd even take a closed-source compiler. The problem is that, ultimately, he's effectively throwing rocks from a glass house, but he denies us the rocks to throw back. I just can't take him seriously.
- dgellow 6y agoIt's currently in private beta as far as I remember from his Twitter timeline.
- spatulon 6y agoCan you think of a less snarky way of saying that he hasn't released it publicly yet?
- the_hoser 6y agoNope. I'm hoping one day that they do. I don't pay attention to Jai anymore, and I'm hoping someone hits me with a link.
- Twisol 6y agoGoodness, the lack of any compiler at all would disqualify a lot of cutting-edge academic research on programming languages, much less the existence of a publically-available compiler. Often all you get is a diagram full of (basically) inscrutable derivation rules.
- the_hoser 6y agoAnd rightfully so. In spite of all of the theory going into those languages, the one thing they're all missing is practice.
- Twisol 6y agoYes, but now you've shifted the goalposts, because I think most people would generally consider PL researchers to have an understanding of programming language design.
- the_hoser 6y agoWell, that's fine, then. Many of them do eventually create something useful later. Johnathan Blow is a game designer, though.
- dgellow 6y agoYou can be more than one single thing. Johnathan Blow is a game designer, a game programmer, an entrepreneur, a programming language designer, etc. At the end of the day he's someone who do write software for a living since decades, and has strong opinions and expectations. And he's using this to create the tools he wants to have.
- Scarbutt 6y agoHe has a beta program for those interested in trying out the compiler.
- the_hoser 6y agoInteresting. Does he specify the qualifications needed to be included?
- IshKebab 6y agoAre you implying that it doesn't exist? It clearly does.
- the_hoser 6y agoIf I can't download and try it, it might as well not exist. There's no way to meaningfully evaluate the language without being able to use it.
- coldtea 6y ago>He has designed a programming language Hasn't everybody and their mums/dads by now? And even so, is that language succesful - to the extend that it means his ideas are more relevant that Rust's designers? It's just a concept implementation at the moment, not a real industry / production / community language.