It looks like the judge gave no reason for her ruling, presumably there was a dictat rather than this just being a capricious decision? There's the lack of ope

It looks like the judge gave no reason for her ruling, presumably there was a dictat rather than this just being a capricious decision? There's the lack of openness 'you can't view the trial' and there's outright obeyance to fascism 'a political interference was made that compromised my former decision and I choose not to make that clear'. Of course the judge could have made a legal error in acceding to the initial request from Amnesty International, but as a judge they would (and should) surely have given the reason for their turn around.