3 ms·

I don't think the 2DS defeats the purpose of the device. The 3D aspect was by design only used in optional ways by nearly all developers and the 2DS as a great,

I don't think the 2DS defeats the purpose of the device. The 3D aspect was by design only used in optional ways by nearly all developers and the 2DS as a great, cheaper, lighter alternative to the original. If anything it makes the handheld more focused and useful by stripping away something that was never really effective to begin with.

fossuser 6y ago
In my case I was trying to get a gift for a friend who plays a lot of monster hunter world and the 3D apparently helps with gameplay since being able to sense the depth makes it easier to fight the monsters. By “defeat the purpose” I just meant that a version of the 3DS without the 3D part isn’t really the same thing. I generally find Nintendo the company frustrating to interact with when trying to buy things from them.
takeda 6y ago
if 2DS was foldable I would buy it instead of 3DS. Didn't really care about the 3D.
- EddieRingle 6y ago
  The New 2DS is the foldable version.
  - fzzzy 6y ago
    Highly recommended, it's great hardware.
  - takeda 6y ago
    Neat, won't buy it since aleady have 3DS, I really wish they created it earlier.