3 ms·
Let's say there was an "ideal" nonlethal weapon that could zap people and immobilize them from far away with no harmful effects. Would that be a good thing? In
by chmod600 6y ago
Let's say there was an "ideal" nonlethal weapon that could zap people and immobilize them from far away with no harmful effects.
Would that be a good thing? In a way, it sounds scarier than a gun.
- bulla 6y agoSounds perfect.
- rblatz 6y agoTo whom?
- SpicyLemonZest 6y agoYeah, I'm with you. A truly harmless long-distance weapon would surely be abused, whether to instill fear or just cause chaos.