5 ms·

Are you saying that the disparate impact here is a statistical outlier from p-hacking, and not an outcome of historic policies excluding certain races?

• SpicyLemonZest 6y ago
  The disparate impact is surely an outcome of historic policies of racial exclusion. But equally surely, it's not unconstitutional in general for Palo Alto to have nice things because of nasty policies they had in the past. So there has to be some middle ground.
  • karpierz 6y ago
    Does the park cease to be nice if non-residents are allowed into it? Should a city be able to decide whether non-residents can use its sidewalks, in order to make the city "nice"?
    • someguydave 6y ago
      >Does the park cease to be nice if non-residents are allowed into it? Yes, if there are too many of them and they act irresponsibly. >Should a city be able to decide whether non-residents can use its sidewalks, in order to make the city "nice"? Yes Are you willing to pay a fee to enter such a city, to offset the costs of your visit?