2 ms·
The law normally considers what a reasonable person would think, doesn't it? Who would think it was anything other than moving under its own power?
by lordnacho 6y ago
The law normally considers what a reasonable person would think, doesn't it? Who would think it was anything other than moving under its own power?
- xkjkls 6y agoIt depends on the circumstance. In the case of an investor, there's much more assumed due diligence than just "what a reasonable person would think".
- lordnacho 6y agoIf the guy shows you a video, are you gonna actually ask him whether it was what it looks like? I guess you ought to kick the tyres on the real thing though.
- awb 6y agoInvestors are supposed to conduct their own due diligence which could include talking to the engineers or setting up a demo under mutually agreed conditions at which point the difference between "in motion" and "driving" would be uncovered. It's definitely not a good look though.
- duskwuff 6y agoContext matters too. No reasonable person would expect a company to post a promotional video of their vehicle "in motion" just to show off that it has wheels that can roll.