3 ms·
He's the guy who informed us all that Alexander is a criminal. Having paid a pretty full price for doing that he's definitely allowed to express an opinion on A
by harry8 6y ago
He's the guy who informed us all that Alexander is a criminal. Having paid a pretty full price for doing that he's definitely allowed to express an opinion on Alexander now cashing in embracing the corruption in big tech and with the sellers of the "Amazon Microphone" [1]
He's got a right to be bitter when he's defended the interests of the people at considerable personal cost from this criminal, who is now getting filthy rich rather than defending charges in a court of law. Beyond that, he actually knows something about surveillance and the surveillance state. He's followed it pretty closely. So far his opinions on the subject that I've noticed have been utterly sensible, well informed, well reasoned and worthy of serious consideration by anyone interested in the topic.
[1] Amazon PR apparently hate their listening device being called the "Amazon Microphone" It seems to convey what it is quite well to people who get bamboozled when recent tech is involved.
- lawnchair_larry 6y agoI think you are setting a very low bar for “filthy rich”.
- harry8 6y agoEye of the beholder. I think you're delusional in the extreme if you think a million bucks a year for attending a couple of meetings doesn't. It surely isn't his way of supporting the American people. He's doing it for the cash. What percentage of people do you think earn a million (for the most part time of part time gigs)? Would any of them be "poor" ? So now what percentage of those with military careers? Do you think on the standards of the military, ie his standards, a million a year isn't filthy rich? It seems to me like a lot more than they report those spying for foreign powers got paid!
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]