5 ms·
Actually firefox is faster at javascrupt that chrome.
by tus88 6y ago
Actually firefox is faster at javascrupt that chrome.
- octoberfranklin 6y agoThat's like saying that emacs's LISP interpreter is faster than vim's vimscript interpreter.... Yeah, so what? The performance-critical parts of vim are written in C. You can't say that about emacs. Or firefox.
- imtringued 6y agoWhy not? Firefox is mostly C, C++ and Rust.
- tus88 6y agoWebpages run faster in Firefox, that's why.
- Naga 6y agoThe performance critical parts of emacs actually are written in C, such as the low-level primitive functions.