4 ms·
It’s just a poor analogy for the law. It’s what programmers turn to but it doesn’t work. The law is a fundamentally human executable. Code is fundamentally com
by rubidium 6y ago
It’s just a poor analogy for the law. It’s what programmers turn to but it doesn’t work.
The law is a fundamentally human executable. Code is fundamentally computer executable.
- scollet 6y agoIs it wrong that my utopia includes a VCS where PRs are submitted by constituents and implemented by incumbents?
- anticensor 6y agoYou will need a TCP-like self-stabilising algorithm to rate-limit code changes.
- scollet 6y agoPushing the hypothetical, what does TCP have to do with this? I may be missing a joke.
- anticensor 6y agoIt is designed to maximise the global packet flow while preserving reliability. A similar system for society would maximise the societal output while preserving conformity.
- imtringued 6y agoIt's not a poor analogy. It works extremely well. In law there are as many interpreters as there are humans.