3 ms·
> the results aren't 100% clear. Do you mean to say that anyone believes even for a second that a politician (by no means a lowest common denominator) didn't s
by krageon 6y ago
> the results aren't 100% clear.
Do you mean to say that anyone believes even for a second that a politician (by no means a lowest common denominator) didn't see it coming that a centralised system full of cameras could be used for surveillance? It's just completely mystifying what sort of results need to become clear here. Good faith is impossible in this case.
- loteck 6y agothe public hearings on this tech were entirely focused on city planning and climate action. We don't find anything on the historic record where anyone at any committee or council session even asked a question about the situational awareness module. I'm not defending them, just telling you what we've found. Back room conversations may have occured.
- DudeInBasement 6y agoMoney probably exchanged hands. "I forgot to ask that question, see it's here in my notes"