3 ms·
For those with wretched joints (me), Spacemacs[1] is a way to have all that org-mode[2] functionality, the joys of magit[3] and have it all work well over SSH.
by smitty1e 6y ago
For those with wretched joints (me), Spacemacs[1] is a way to have all that org-mode[2] functionality, the joys of magit[3] and have it all work well over SSH.
Leave all the icons to their fans.
[1] https://www.spacemacs.org/ https://www.spacemacs.org/
[2] https://orgmode.org/ https://orgmode.org/
[3] https://magit.vc/ https://magit.vc/
- mkesper 6y agoAfter finding doom-emacs, I love that even more. Almost instant startup, non-broken magit key bindings, doom doctor etc. https://github.com/hlissner/doom-emacs https://github.com/hlissner/doom-emacs
- DreamyCori 6y agoIt seems like doom-emacs is the new way to go. I feel quiet sad about this cause I spent some time to switch to Spacemacs and now I have to move to another emacs distro.
- dunefox 6y agoWhy do you have to move? Are you using the dev-branch Spacemacs or master?
- DreamyCori 6y agomaster cause I want something stable.
- dunefox 6y agoI'm on dev and it's quite stable, imo. Then again I'm not a spacemacs poweruser so...
- DreamyCori 6y agoAnyone is info about the release model of Spacemacs ? It seems like nothing is moving. Any news ?
- sseneca 6y agoThe release model is a mess. Most people tend to stick with using Spacemacs on the `develop` branch, which means updating via `git pull --rebase` every so often as well as the inbuilt `SPC f e U`. I've been using Spacemacs for around a year on the `develop` branch. For me it's fine, but for those who want a very stable experience I don't recommend it -- it does break sometimes.
- DreamyCori 6y agoThis unclear release strategy sends a bad signal to the community and pushes people to doom-emacs. Sad to see ...
- krageon 6y agoWhich also has most of the good stuff on the develop branch :)