3 ms·
That's a serious problem. Whether work gets done should be independent of whether or not you have new hires around. And what lesson are you teaching if that's
by hashkb 6y ago
That's a serious problem. Whether work gets done should be independent of whether or not you have new hires around. And what lesson are you teaching if that's how you complete that kind of work? Onboarding is "hey do this thing nobody else will ever do, so we can say engineers ship on day one"
- wink 6y agoI disagree, it's a much more helpful way to let them explore the code base than "here, write a test for some feature you also don't understand". Where I was it was never a stated goal to have them ship asap, the goal was a) to let them learn quickly and b) let them not hate their new job. Incidentally, everyone except one person liked this approach. Hands-on, have the genuine feeling to do something sensible (maybe not important, but hey, it's your first week) and NOT spend 2w just reading docs.
- hashkb 6y agoI think that's a false dichotomy. For example, have new hires pair with someone who is making good progress on something medium sized and medium impact. Share in a nearly guaranteed success, learn, and no need to hoard one-pointers.