4 ms·
Scribd have consistently been a horrible company. They actively "slurped" (their word) as many documents as they could, ignoring things like copyright, into th
by ErrantX 6y ago
Scribd have consistently been a horrible company.
They actively "slurped" (their word) as many documents as they could, ignoring things like copyright, into their archive. They brushed a lot of those concerns aside which left a really sour taste.
HN actually used to have a feature to switch PDF links to Scribd ones (not sure if it was manual or automatic)[1]
1. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1124940 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1124940
- jacquesm 6y agoThat was a - largely successful - attempt to boost ScribD by using HN. Indirectly this benefited YC.
- ErrantX 6y agoYep, still grates to this day.
- goodbye_twy 6y agoWhat even? Has there been an apology from dang for this? Is this sort of thing still happening? I have a rule not to read forums which do shady stuff to the content. Maybe it's time to adblock the HN homepage.
- Rexxar 6y ago10 years ago pdf was not properly supported in browsers and there was a lot of complaints on each pdf submissions. This was probably seen as a good idea to fix this problem at the time.
- plorkyeran 6y agoIt happened significantly before dang's involvement in HN.
- goodgriefer 6y agoIt's always the same with VC's. Do what you can (illegal or no), obfuscate and redirect, ignore when possible, and finally fake-apology ("we're sorry you feel bad"). Sure the "rules" say to assume with best intentions. That goes along with "obfuscate and redirect". It's easier to point at rules as a club to make an example. But in reality, in the end VCs are themselves toxic. Look no further than the crowd of businesses and partners YC surrounds itself with.
- yc_yuck 6y agoVery true. Unfortunately, too many people ignore this, or don't realize this, and instead lionize VCs like they're some class of better humans or something. Quite sickening, really.
- goodgriefer 6y agoIt is obvious why these people suck up to VC's. It's where the easy money is. Banks are super risk adverse (in business 3+ years, with client base and revenue, and collateral).. Versus some shit VCs who'll encourage to "disrupt" (eg: dismiss legal or safety regulations to extract quick profit) with a 1 out of 10 chance of a startup hitting the hockey stick growth. Lie with the dogs, and you get fleas. I'll leave it to the reader to decide who the dogs and fleas are.
- 1123581321 6y agoI appreciated that feature (and Scribd, generally) at the time. I’m not happy with what the company became but I’m not rewriting my memory over it.
- bluntfang 6y agosounds a lot like archive.org
- jyriand 6y agoI don't know what to think about Scribd. I clearly remember all the shady tactics they used with copyrighted pdf's etc, but on the other hand I'm a pretty happy customer of theirs. Where else could I get thousands of ebooks and audiobooks for 7-8 euros per month?