Its ironic that a flag designed to support a land rights movement ends up in a situation where the indigenous peoples are fighting for the rights to it. Is ther

Its ironic that a flag designed to support a land rights movement ends up in a situation where the indigenous peoples are fighting for the rights to it. Is there some deeper reason behind why the designer of the flag would claim copyright and try and make money off the flag - maybe to prevent some other sort of exploitation? Otherwise that seems like a pretty greedy and directly hypocritical thing to do.