3 ms·
If I understand correctly, the content was entirely about hypnotizing people and having sex with them? Which means they couldn't legally consent? So it's enti
by VikingCoder 6y ago
If I understand correctly, the content was entirely about hypnotizing people and having sex with them?
Which means they couldn't legally consent?
So it's entirely about non-consensual sex?
So it's entirely about rape?
I don't think you've chosen a very good Poster Child for the argument that Patreon was in the wrong.
- Dylan16807 6y agoNo that's not the one I was talking about, and that article talks about multiple cases and links to more at the bottom. And if you object to the consent issues with fictional hypnosis let me tell you about this story called fifty shades of gray...