3 ms·

"a lot". Can you name some?

• Dylan16807 6y ago
  I don't really feel like making a list, but you can look up how they've been weird and inconsistent with adult content, emphasis on inconsistent for how it doesn't feel like any kind of moral stance. The most recent one I saw was Patreon demanding an artist delete all adult images of a specific character on all websites because they found an old image where this weird monster thing didn't have breasts as a design choice. https://www.dailydot.com/irl/patreon-gay-hypnosis-artists/ https://www.dailydot.com/irl/patreon-gay-hypnosis-artists/ here's an article I guess?
  • VikingCoder 6y ago
    If I understand correctly, the content was entirely about hypnotizing people and having sex with them? Which means they couldn't legally consent? So it's entirely about non-consensual sex? So it's entirely about rape? I don't think you've chosen a very good Poster Child for the argument that Patreon was in the wrong.
    • Dylan16807 6y ago
      No that's not the one I was talking about, and that article talks about multiple cases and links to more at the bottom. And if you object to the consent issues with fictional hypnosis let me tell you about this story called fifty shades of gray...