5 ms·
Banned from where? What does AdNauseam do differently than uBO that would incentivize people to use it?
by owowow 6y ago
Banned from where? What does AdNauseam do differently than uBO that would incentivize people to use it?
- kalleboo 6y agoAdNauseam clicks on all the ads it blocks in the background, getting your IP/browser flagged for clickfraud in the ad networks
- raxxorrax 6y agoThat sounds really good. Supports websites you visit without seeing ads. Dishonesty isn't really a topic if we are talking ads.
- javagram 6y agoClick fraud can actually get the website banned if the ad network thinks it’s responsible, so no it’s not really good.
- raxxorrax 6y agoDid that happen to any site already? Wonder how they could detect it and if that detection can be circumvented. It is a natural visit in this case. Click fraud should be taught at school or in self defense courses to be honest.
- ffpip 6y agoYes. Many sites on HN have complanied about Google 'detecting fraud on your site' and banning it. You can get your competitor's site banned this way. Just run bots on his site. 'Pay us, or we'll get Google to ban your ads' -https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22348568 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22348568
- rjmunro 6y agoSupports them by getting them banned from Ad networks, taking their revenue away? Or at the very least reducing ad conversions for their advertisers, meaning they become a less valuable place to advertise on. What is "Dishonesty isn't really a topic if we are talking ads" supposed to mean?
- raxxorrax 6y agoAdvertisers have zero scrutiny in tracking me and extracting as much personal info as they can, so accusations about dishonesty about faking an incentive to buy something doesn't really reach my conscience too much. Do we have examples were sites were banned for this behavior? I think "click fraud" doesn't actually fit, since it is not the operator of the site who is responsible. I would be more open to call that behavior fraudulent. I mean cases where users fake their activity. edit: And if true, why wouldn't I go to google.com and let it run there for a while? Just researched the Google really put effort in banning it.
- ffpip 6y agoMany sites were banned from running ads. Google.com ads are search specific. They'll ban you first, before stopping ads.
- ffpip 6y agoIt decreases your privacy. Not using an adblocker is better than using it for privacy. However, if your wish is to stop seeing ads, but click them, use it. Don't be surprised when your IP is banned, or the website is banned