4 ms·
Yeah, cuz that how every social change occurred in the world. Via two people talking in the room... Give me a break, legal system never changes itself. From G
by me_me_me 6y ago
Yeah, cuz that how every social change occurred in the world.
Via two people talking in the room...
Give me a break, legal system never changes itself.
From Ghandi, Bolshevik revolution, Solidarity, French revolution to MLK.
Change only occurs due to mass civil dissonance or armed revolutions.
Never because you talk in a court and all people in power agreed you make sense.
- WJW 6y agoYou're arguing a different point than I made. Legal systems are as averse to change as the large masses of society (ie very averse). They do move eventually btw, but it's more on the scale of decades than months. What I was getting at is that protesting is not a very reliable way to effect change either. The "other side" of any protest is also trying to change the narrative and can often just wait out the protests. Look at how the various Occupy movements eventually dissolved after a few months because they weren't getting anywhere. Even the "main" camp (if one can talk about such a thing with Occupy) was eventually cleared by the police and didn't bother reforming somewhere else anymore. The gilets jaunes in France are currently experiencing the same problem. I'd be quite interested in a way to reliably bring about societal change in a reasonable amount of time and in a morally defensible way, but I have not found any yet. Since philosophers have been debating this since the days of the ancient Greeks I'm a bit doubtful that this is the time when we'll finally figure it out.
- shirakawasuna 6y agoProtesting is very effective when you do actual direct action and civil disobedience. Americans have gotten used to running ignorable police-sanctioned parades and calling them protests.
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]