3 ms·
> 3. The AI wasn't trying to avoid head-ons. Why should it? Presumably the AI pilot is backed up / remote / not precious - while the human pilot has an inheren
by e12e 6y ago
> 3. The AI wasn't trying to avoid head-ons.
Why should it? Presumably the AI pilot is backed up / remote / not precious - while the human pilot has an inherent value - isn't reckless disregard one benefit of automated systems?
- RandyRanderson 6y agoYou don't risk an expensive plane with head-ons - that's what missiles are for. This was testing the AI. If real-world AI was going to be deployed in warfare shooting down manned planes, you'd make custom hardware that is smaller, faster and 10-100x cheaper than a f-35.