3 ms·
Three huge issues with this test: 1. The AI had "total situational awareness" (perfect position, direction, velocity of opponent). Even given 360 cameras, rada
by RandyRanderson 6y ago
Three huge issues with this test:
1. The AI had "total situational awareness" (perfect position, direction, velocity of opponent). Even given 360 cameras, radar, etc there is still uncertainty, errors, etc.
2. The human was an expert pilot, not a sim expert (see videos, he was going way too fast several times, not something he'd do in a real plane). A DCS master would likely have done better.
3. The AI wasn't trying to avoid head-ons.
With this and the Starcraft2 blink micro "win" I'm just going to these from now on.
- e12e 6y ago> 3. The AI wasn't trying to avoid head-ons. Why should it? Presumably the AI pilot is backed up / remote / not precious - while the human pilot has an inherent value - isn't reckless disregard one benefit of automated systems?
- RandyRanderson 6y agoYou don't risk an expensive plane with head-ons - that's what missiles are for. This was testing the AI. If real-world AI was going to be deployed in warfare shooting down manned planes, you'd make custom hardware that is smaller, faster and 10-100x cheaper than a f-35.
- edelans 6y ago4. The human pilot doesn't experience any load factor, he can sustain 9Gs doing circles for over a minute