4 ms·
My previous employer used it, and I use it nowadays for my side project. I like it, but granted, its the only log ingestion software I've ever used, so cant com
by rsrx 6y ago
My previous employer used it, and I use it nowadays for my side project. I like it, but granted, its the only log ingestion software I've ever used, so cant compare it. The charts I made are nice and I can easily pinpoint errors, bottlenecks and similar in my platform/code.
Here are some views that we're using for our little startup:
https://i.imgur.com/Q1V6ArY.png https://i.imgur.com/Q1V6ArY.png
https://i.imgur.com/rCfg4nr.png https://i.imgur.com/rCfg4nr.png
https://i.imgur.com/GgYHgPA.png https://i.imgur.com/GgYHgPA.png
- edoceo 6y agoThose metrics are pretty but not much different than what one gets from Prometheus+Grafana
- ryanisnan 6y agoFrom my experience, Sumo really touts its `logreduce` functionality, which is a process of filtering logs for anomalous messages and bringing interesting things to your attention. It worked pretty well to be fair, but it got a bit expensive (as things usually do). I would probably use them again.
- winrid 6y agoYeah but you get a whole bunch of other stuff. Alerting, flexible outlier detection, aggregations, aggregations + joins (like sql)...