3 ms·
We don’t “know” something just because one study showed it. But mincome actually did show a reduction in working hours, which is hard to spin as “improve emplo
by akvadrako 6y ago
We don’t “know” something just because one study showed it.
But mincome actually did show a reduction in working hours, which is hard to spin as “improve employment”.
- soco 6y agoIt says "mostly women using the money to have more time to care for their children". I call this improvement, if not in "employment" (an abstract concept) then in "quality of life" (a real thing)
- andi999 6y agoThis might also be interpretd as anti-feminist, since this will increase the non-adjusted gender pay gap.
- Ma8ee 6y agoWe men better use more time to take care of children to compensate for that (and get better relationsships with our children).
- fuf7rurehfr 6y agoThat doesn't resolve the concern laid out by the parent commenter at all.
- Ma8ee 6y agoIt certainly does. If men was at home with their children as much as women, the part of the non-adjusted gender pay gap that is due to women being home more with children would disappear.
- imtringued 6y agoI know people who absolutely despise their job. More money isn't necessarily better.
- bickeringyokel 6y agoI would say both of those things are pretty abstract.