4 ms·
Really? This seems like a pretty clear explanation to me. They are required by law to provide information. That's not selling... that's just complying with the
by lazzlazzlazz 6y ago
Really? This seems like a pretty clear explanation to me.
They are required by law to provide information. That's not selling... that's just complying with their obligation to provide certain data.
And they charge a fee for it.
In other words, if you want to prevent them from providing information, you need to change the laws requiring they share information.
- derimagia 6y agoDoesn't make complete sense to me. If they are complying with their obligation but they can charge a fee why wouldn't they be able to increase the fee enough to get out of actually providing the information? EDIT: I think I got it - I am hearing the fee is equal to the amount it costs them to provide it.
- jjeaff 6y agoSort of? Is Amazon not "selling" retail products because they aren't really making a profit on it? In fact, they aren't always even recouping their full cost of selling products, those losses are offset by other revenue streams like aws.