2 ms·
>Logically, if objects that can survive a million encounter with stars exist, they would seem a million times more common than objects that could survive one T
by perl4ever 6y ago
>Logically, if objects that can survive a million encounter with stars exist, they would seem a million times more common than objects that could survive one
That doesn't seem quite right. Wouldn't they be a million times more common relative to their overall proportion in the universe? Durable objects could be, say, one in a million, cancelling out the probability.
- joe_the_user 6y agoI mean "all else being equal", of course all else might not be equal. The thing is that I don't think objects need to be that durable to survive for a long time in space.