3 ms·
I don't think he forgot; he's being intentionally misleading. What about dividends? Starting another company? Working as a CEO or board member? The article ha
by theplague42 6y ago
I don't think he forgot; he's being intentionally misleading.
What about dividends? Starting another company? Working as a CEO or board member?
The article has a terrible foundation because he's intentionally misleading the reader.
- SpicyLemonZest 6y agoThe board is unlikely to agree to give a CEO or board member enough stock to maintain control of the company. I don't even think this is an unintentional goal - most wealth tax proponents I've seen are explicitly trying to prevent situations like with Cargill or Walmart, where the founder and his descendants can control the company forever.
- hanniabu 6y agoI think the word you're looking for is vague. He's being intentionally vague, not misleading.