It looks like the misreading part was the right one, then. The intent of your original comment is clearer now, in light of this response. You're saying that W

It looks like the misreading part was the right one, then. The intent of your original comment is clearer now, in light of this response. You're saying that Wikimedia's spending is somewhat rational, whereas Mozilla's revenue might disappear as the result of a single party making a decision to walk away. You're not saying that Mozilla is a ragtag group of browser developers with barely any money. (There was too much focus on "Mozilla obviously doesn't [have the money to waste]" in the earlier reading.)