3 ms·

It agrees with you - "Some taxa and sites showed decreases in abundance and diversity" But rejecting science in favor of personal anecdote is ridiculous bad th

It agrees with you - "Some taxa and sites showed decreases in abundance and diversity" But rejecting science in favor of personal anecdote is ridiculous bad thinking when an anecdote doesn't disprove it.

mistrial9 6y ago
yes agree, AND one paper is not big-S science
- lopmotr 6y ago
  You'd better also reject any "one paper" that entirely agrees with your personal experience too. You do that, right?