2 ms·

This simply is not true. You may not know enough about food culture or architecture to see it, but those trends move just as quickly as the rest of human cultur

This simply is not true. You may not know enough about food culture or architecture to see it, but those trends move just as quickly as the rest of human culture. Still-functional products being discarded on a whim is basically the history of architecture. The fact is, all of human culture is “arbitrary” and bad for the environment. Food, architecture, fashion, and civilization itself. Just because you don’t care about clothing specifically, doesn’t make it somehow worse than everything else we do. The only thing that is good for the environment is becoming a nomadic hunter-gatherer and living off the land.

mthoms 6y ago
You're asserting that architecture changes faster than fashion? I'm not even sure how to rebuff that since it's so patently ridiculous on its face. As for food trends, they are indeed changing faster than ever but they're more on a 3-5 year cycle at most. Certainly not 6 months. Let's examine the word arbitrary. The "in" colors, styles and cuts (the entire make-up of clothing) are undeniably arbitrary and change every 6 months. There's nothing remotely comparable in food or architecture. Based on your other comment, you seem to take great offence at fashion being disparaged here. It's okay to like fashion. It's the industry that's being attacked, not you personally. And yes, other industries are bad, some even more so. But that's irrelevant.