3 ms·
Kinda seems like the real purpose of this saboteur service isn't so much to engineer the end of your relationship so you don't have to, or just to acquire legal
by jccc 6y ago
Kinda seems like the real purpose of this saboteur service isn't so much to engineer the end of your relationship so you don't have to, or just to acquire legal proof so the law will let you two divorce, but rather to engineer the end in such a way that it financially advantages the employer of the saboteur.
She cheated on me, so I get to keep the house.
The headline and framing of the story hides the greed/selfishness/manipulation/exploitation.
(Of course, the bigger part of the actual event is the murder, but the story minimizes that too.)
- toxik 6y agoThat is a good point, the end game is maximizing the separation cash out. Not entirely unlike bosses who give employees they want to fire impossible tasks until they quit of their own volition.
- SkyBelow 6y agoSeems similar to a police sting operation. Providing the opportunity to commit a crime but not forcing them to, so when they do it is used against them. In this case it isn't an actual crime, but an action that is disadvantageous in divorce. But given the comparison, if someone is okay with police stings should they also be okay with this?
- philwelch 6y agoIn cultures without no-fault divorce, manufacturing fault like this is sometimes necessary for the divorce to happen at all, regardless of the eventual settlements.