4 ms·
Although I refuted some of your arguments above (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24033759 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24033759), I agree that cryp
by zenexer 6y ago
Although I refuted some of your arguments above (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24033759 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24033759), I agree that cryptocurrency has fairly limited utility, especially given the costs.
The biggest issue I have with cryptocurrency is that it’s an utter waste of resources. It incentivizes the consumption of electricity (and talent) purely to print money, rather than to produce value. Yes, currencies provide some value to society, but we already have more sustainable options.
I see the appeal if you hate taxes and regulations or live under a particularly oppressive regime. However, given that it relies, to some extent, on public infrastructure like internet and electricity that governments can outright shut off if they so desire, there are better options. Raw materials and bartering work pretty well. Just don’t invest in tulips.
- 5986043handy 6y agoThe waste of electricity/mining gear is mostly due to Proof of Work consensus, but moving to Proof of Stake/other consensus algorithms will eliminate basically all waste (eg. Ethereum is moving to PoS).
- asdfasgasdgasdg 6y agoI feel like I've been hearing about ethereum proof of stake for years. When are they actually going to move to it?
- Polylactic_acid 6y agoFrom what I can see, cryptocurrency is technologically frozen right now because any change results in some people making less money so there can never be a consensus on anything.
- dogecoinbase 6y agoNo one has a demonstrated effective PoS implementation yet (that isn't simple centralization). ETH will not move to PoS anytime soon enough to be meaningful, nor will any other cryptocurrency.